WeGotMud

Projects & Parts => Garage/Tech => Topic started by: buddman (AKA Mick) on February 06, 2012, 12:44:48 AM

Title: Roller vs Hydrolic
Post by: buddman (AKA Mick) on February 06, 2012, 12:44:48 AM
Hears the scoop, got a 96 or so 5.7 with factory roller cam that somthing in the bottem end locked up on, not sure what yet. Gonna tear it down this week i hope. Providing its rebuldildable what would be better all around, using the factory roller cam in it if it still in good shape or a hydrolic cam a grind or two above stock?  Its a 94 5.7 throttle body motor in my 94 chevy 4x4 daily driver/ bauger hauller. Just looking for any help guys. Thanks ==wgm
Title: Re: Roller vs Hydrolic
Post by: xjs3667 on February 06, 2012, 01:15:29 AM
roller cam by far
Title: Re: Roller vs Hydrolic
Post by: Orangecrush on February 06, 2012, 01:18:31 AM
Quote from: xjs3667 on February 06, 2012, 01:15:29 AM
roller cam by far
x2
Title: Re: Roller vs Hydrolic
Post by: Bowtie972 on February 06, 2012, 01:47:48 AM
Quote from: Orangecrush on February 06, 2012, 01:18:31 AM
Quote from: xjs3667 on February 06, 2012, 01:15:29 AM
roller cam by far
x2

Definitely
Title: Re: Roller vs Hydrolic
Post by: Jjay78 on February 06, 2012, 03:19:12 AM
stick with roller, but y not get a bigger roller cam??
Title: Re: Roller vs Hydrolic
Post by: MidMichiganMudRun on February 06, 2012, 01:15:11 PM
roller
Title: Re: Roller vs Hydrolic
Post by: buddman (AKA Mick) on February 06, 2012, 01:52:09 PM
Well  that was easy. thanks guys!
Title: Re: Roller vs Hydrolic
Post by: OHEARN.2012 on February 07, 2012, 02:06:24 AM
rollers are expensive but you get alot less wear on parts
Title: Re: Roller vs Hydrolic
Post by: Kyle on February 07, 2012, 06:48:44 AM
Not only less wear with rolllers but u can get a whole lot better cam profiles too. They maybe $$$ but its worth it IMO
Title: Re: Roller vs Hydrolic
Post by: buddman (AKA Mick) on February 07, 2012, 05:03:57 PM
Money is the reason I gonna stick with the factoey roller. Kinda a budget build on this one. Thanks for all the input guys.
Title: Re: Roller vs Hydrolic
Post by: Jjay78 on February 07, 2012, 05:55:17 PM
well if money is tight, what about just getting a higher ratio set of rockers to get more lift and duration at the valve
Title: Re: Roller vs Hydrolic
Post by: Jthomas on February 15, 2012, 09:46:47 PM
Quote from: Jjay78 on February 07, 2012, 05:55:17 PM
well if money is tight, what about just getting a higher ratio set of rockers to get more lift and duration at the valve

X2

But in some cases a nice set of roller rockers with a longer ratio will run around the same price as a half ass cam. Go to summit or jegs and compare prices so you don't have to jump from site to site. But both jegs and summit are rather expencive, it just a good place to look up parts.
Title: Re: Roller vs Hydrolic
Post by: buddman (AKA Mick) on February 15, 2012, 11:31:24 PM
Thanks for all the info guys. Tore the motor down and for some reason it wiped out half the bearings. Just gonna find a stocker for know to gat it back on the road, Gonna have to be haulin the bogger soon.  Just alot of money in just the machine work to get it ready to assemble right now.
Title: Re: Roller vs Hydrolic
Post by: Boggen Joe on February 16, 2012, 10:57:25 PM
a roller cam for that is not expensive, the litters are less then $10 each at parts store
roller is only way to go
Title: Re: Roller vs Hydrolic
Post by: xjs3667 on February 16, 2012, 11:35:40 PM
Quote from: Boggen Joe on February 16, 2012, 10:57:25 PM
a roller cam for that is not expensive, the litters are less then $10 each at parts store
roller is only way to go

I just had to price these out for the motor im rebuilding and at autozone lifters are 26 bucks each and cam is 250 bucks, the 10 dollar lifters are no longer made.   so your looking at 400 bucks for lifters and another 250 for cam = 650+ bucks    bud if you think thats not expensive  then id like to have your job lol
Title: Re: Roller vs Hydrolic
Post by: 7d9_z28 on February 17, 2012, 01:59:27 AM
Quote from: buddman on February 06, 2012, 12:44:48 AM
Hears the scoop, got a 96 or so 5.7 with factory roller cam that somthing in the bottem end locked up on, not sure what yet. Gonna tear it down this week i hope. Providing its rebuldildable what would be better all around, using the factory roller cam in it if it still in good shape or a hydrolic cam a grind or two above stock?  Its a 94 5.7 throttle body motor in my 94 chevy 4x4 daily driver/ bauger hauller. Just looking for any help guys. Thanks ==wgm
Im a bit confused, maybe I didnt read this right... You started saying its a 96 or so roller (vortec motor) and at the end said its a 94 5.7? (non vortec...)

If its a vortec, roller is the only way to go. if you jump up the profile though, the vortec heads need ls1 beehive springs, the stock springs are only good to like.480 lift. the lt4 hotcam is a common upgrade for the vortecs
Title: Re: Roller vs Hydrolic
Post by: buddman (AKA Mick) on February 18, 2012, 02:10:38 AM
Quote from: 7d9_z28 on February 17, 2012, 01:59:27 AM
Quote from: buddman on February 06, 2012, 12:44:48 AM
Hears the scoop, got a 96 or so 5.7 with factory roller cam that somthing in the bottem end locked up on, not sure what yet. Gonna tear it down this week i hope. Providing its rebuldildable what would be better all around, using the factory roller cam in it if it still in good shape or a hydrolic cam a grind or two above stock?  Its a 94 5.7 throttle body motor in my 94 chevy 4x4 daily driver/ bauger hauller. Just looking for any help guys. Thanks ==wgm
Im a bit confused, maybe I didnt read this right... You started saying its a 96 or so roller (vortec motor) and at the end said its a 94 5.7? (non vortec...)

If its a vortec, roller is the only way to go. if you jump up the profile though, the vortec heads need ls1 beehive springs, the stock springs are only good to like.480 lift. the lt4 hotcam is a common upgrade for the vortecs
Sorrry bout the confusion, meant it has the 94 heads and throttle body set up on it but the block is the 96 or so 4 bolt factory roller cam.
Title: Re: Roller vs Hydrolic
Post by: Strapless on February 28, 2012, 07:24:20 AM
Xjs3667. Get them at a machine shop. I got a full brand new set for a 96 lt1 for 150. 400 is not right. You can buy retro roller hyd. for that!
Title: Re: Roller vs Hydrolic
Post by: xjs3667 on February 28, 2012, 03:22:43 PM
Quote from: Strapless on February 28, 2012, 07:24:20 AM
Xjs3667. Get them at a machine shop. I got a full brand new set for a 96 lt1 for 150. 400 is not right. You can buy retro roller hyd. for that!

Yea I know 400 is crazy, but there was nuthing wrong with the stock ones that I could tell so I just put em back in, looks like im guna be firing it up by this weekend, so ill see how it goes, lol im always leary about the first fire after I rebuild, even tho ive never had one fail on me I still get butterflys in my stomach on first fire lol