Larry King is Moderating the REAL Debate on CSPAN at 9PM TONIGHT

[lilred]

Larry King is Moderating the 3rd party debates tonight on CSPAN at 9pm! It will be worth watching, they will actually be discussing the major issues unlike the recent puppet shows. The Democrats and Republicans were invited but they both declined their whoopin'

CSPAN is the only network in the USA willing to cover the event, because the rest of the media is so unbias right?
RT out of Russia will be covering it as well.

Anyways. Hope you all get to watch it, I will be!!!

Side note: Gary Johnson will be on the ballot in 47 states, Jill Stein will be on 85% of the ballots. Both were denied spots in the recent presidential debates (although they had the support to be on stage by rule). Jill Stein was even arrested outside of the 2nd debate for trying to enter the building.

[lilred]

Heres the coverage of Jill Stein's arrest outside of the R&D puppet show.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/16/hofstra-debate-jill-stein-arrested-green-party_n_1971960.html

[magic]

waste of time....even if they bring up valid points not enough people will ever give up being liberal or conservative....and if u claim to be in the middle and want to make a difference pick on of the two ass's that best fits u...or waste your vote and nobody will care either way...it is what it is

[lilred]

I'm just voting on who I want to be my president. If that offends you then  and have a nice day

[lilred]

The same people who are complacent about the lies like the weapons of mass destruction are sitting back now and watching tyranny on our home land and saying oh well. Ya'll need a get these THIEVING CRIMINALS out of our white house!

HOW please explain, is it right to ARREST a presidential candidate who by rule is qualified to be on stage? I don't even support Jill Stein and it pisses me off. I HATE seeing anyones rights violated but yet millions just sit back and say well it wasn't me so whatever. Get off ur 's and do something.

This is not aimed at any individual (although I'm sure there is a comeback on its way as if it was). Its a public service announcement from a pissed fellow American.

[lilred]

[magic]

I'm just voting on who I want to be my president. If that offends you then  and have a nice day

why would that offend anyone? that is your right...for now anyways...to vote for whoever u want. i'm just saying with the way the people are today you will never get a 3rd party person in the white house to make a difference. sad thing is even if they ever do he/she will be held hostage by the house and the senate so again it will not matter. u want to make a real difference stop promoting 3rd party candidates for pres and fill the house and senate with them where they actually could do some good

[lilred]

Working on it. As far as getting someone in the white house what's it matter we have evil a or evil b. Truth is one guy doesn't make all the decisions.  That's why I also promote people like justin amash, kurt haskel, tom wassa, mike gardner, joe graves, and may others nation wide running for congress, house and Senate.

I do get tired of being accused of throwing my vote away. When in reality there's not enough of a difference between the two to really consider it a choice at all. It doesn't hurt to listen to these 3rd party candidates if only to hear another side of things.

The libertarian party candidate right now could just as well run as Republican like he did as governor. It doesn't change his ideals, or how he runs things. It's just a label!

[marshall]

I vote third party, because I can.  More to vote on than just president that day.

[390JOE]

ok to interject here, i was watching the cbs news (i know i get my news from retards, but thats not the point), and they were talking about the electoral college, and i was like damn that sucks going by what was said;

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=50133559n&tag=showDoorFlexGridLeft;flexGridModule

and then i read this;

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/carl-creasman/defending-the-electoral-c_b_2012010.html

now im really confused. but my point here is that we dont vote for the person that we want, we vote for someone to say that we voted for someone, (if that makes any sense).

[lilred]

The major downside to not having the electoral college is it is majority rule, which sounds great but like it was said in the video, the candidates would just focus on heavy population, where typically Democrats have the most support. Maybe that would push the other parties to campaign everywhere else to try to build the support? I don't know. The same problem lies in the college as there is in the GOP nomination process, the elector can vote his/her conscious instead of by the popular vote.

I thought it was hilarious out of all the people he interview saul anusis, he was our chairman in Michigan, I was there earlier this year at the state convention where we voted him out. So either it's a old interview or he is claiming he is someone he's not.
Saul is a real peice of work, the 'leader" of keeping 3rd party candidates off the ballot.