377 sbc

Started by ballistics-10, November 03, 2011, 04:48:36 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

ballistics-10

aggravated assault is here!!!!

Jjay78

Quote from: 355REDNECK on November 07, 2011, 02:02:36 AM
Quote from: Jr on November 03, 2011, 06:05:03 AM
but if your de-stroking a engine... build a 352.....  they are nasty engines... you just use a 237 crank not a 350 crank

more rpm's
what is this a 283 crank in a 350 block

no a 283 crank in a 350 block makes a 302 if it's stock bore
chevvv ==rf chevgal There's plenty of room for all god's creatures............ right next to the mashed potatoes.... ==rf chevgal chevvv

355REDNECK

Quote from: Jjay78 on November 07, 2011, 02:40:11 AM
Quote from: 355REDNECK on November 07, 2011, 02:02:36 AM
Quote from: Jr on November 03, 2011, 06:05:03 AM
but if your de-stroking a engine... build a 352.....  they are nasty engines... you just use a 237 crank not a 350 crank

more rpm's
what is this a 283 crank in a 350 block

no a 283 crank in a 350 block makes a 302 if it's stock bore
how do u get the 352 then
WHEN IN DOUBT THROTTLE OUT

ballistics-10

400 block with 283 crank
aggravated assault is here!!!!

Jjay78

#24
Quote from: bigmike on November 07, 2011, 09:37:27 PM
400 block with 283 crank

actually that's only 320 cid...with a stock bore.. and with a 327 crank it would be a 347, and a 372 with a 350 crank.. but a 283 with a 400 crank would be a 354
chevvv ==rf chevgal There's plenty of room for all god's creatures............ right next to the mashed potatoes.... ==rf chevgal chevvv

bmx0964

On the subject of 6.0" rods vs 5.7" rods they both have there up and down sides. My information comes from information I have gathered from planning my 383 build. I am not a professional engine build but the information I am giving came from some very well known builders along with my own hours and hours of research. If what I am posting is wrong please correct me.

The 2 best things about 6.0" rods are more rotating mass so more torque. The other is that a 6.0" rod will have a smaller angle of deflection on the piston to the wall. The 6.0" rod being longer does not put as much lateral (sideways) force on the piston into the cylinder wall. See the picture below. Nothing in the picture is to scale just a quick drawing I made to show what I am saying. This is over-exaggerated to show the difference. The red rod is the 6.0" rod and the blue rod is the 5.7" rod. If you picture the crankshaft rotating clockwise you will see how shorter rod puts more force shoving the piston into the wall than the longer rod.



The plus sides to 5.7" rods is the already stated wrist pin locations (keeping the wrist pin lower and out of the piston rings). The other is less rotating mass so they spin up the RPM's faster and easier.

It all depends on what you want to do.

old school truck dude

Gotta watch out for clearance issues with the crank/rod/piston skirt assembly when ya get to changin these things around. They dont always tell everything in the forums. Sometimes ya gotta do a little grindin in there  8)

Powered by EzPortal